Introducing Animated JPEG
I think in this article I can say that we can now create a JPEG animated file extension using optical illusion. By this type of creativity, we can produce animation for all our JPEG file. Look closely the below images and you will see the magic.
1. Flowing Leaves

If you focus on brown leaf shapes against a green background, it creates a motion. Picture Source: Flickr
2. Waves

Move your eyes left and right to see the motion. Picture Source: Flickr
3. Rotating Flowers

Move your eyes left and right to see the motion. Picture Source: Flickr
4. Kaleidoscopes

Move your eyes left and right to see the motion. Picture Source: Flickr
| Subscribed with my site for more tutorial updates |
Possibly Related Posts:
- Facebook Applications Best Logo Design
- Amazing Parrot Flower Plants Photos
- 2009 Best Web Banners Design (468X60)
- 100% Top Most Downloaded Amazing Wallpapers
- G-Force Captain Squirrel Army Very Amazing Picture Design
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
9 Responses
to “Introducing Animated JPEG”
1 Trackback(s)
- Sep 17, 2009: Graphic Design Links and Tutorials




Hello guys! My name is R3ALISTIC WEB - a.k.a "R3" . I am fulltime / freelance web designer and blogger wanna be from the Philippines. R3ALISTIC is a blog site all about tutorials, design, ideas, and daily web trends. 





































That is great . . . The first one worked best on me, spooky.
I love how the image names say “Optical-Illusion” in them XD
I was really trying to search for animated stuff… rather than just illusion
I must say you have got a very nice title for this post. When I clicked on the link to land here I thought it would be a tutorial to show how to create animated JPEG files but this one is something I did not think about
very cool
These images are cool!
This is interesting now it would be fun to try to use this technique in a production image
I would say that the "standing" issues raised by the defense are almost specious or at least illusory and might justify a separate parallel response along those lines? ,